Seeing the Inner Workings of the Brain
A team of scientists at Stanford University has improved a technique called CLARITY that they developed in 2013 to look into brains from deceased donors, according to a paper published June 19th 2014 in Nature Protocols. A release from the university explains that without this tool, the fatty outer covering of the brain’s nerve cells blocks microscopes from taking images of the intricate connections between deep brain cells. CLARITY eliminates the fatty covering while keeping the brain intact with all its intricate inner wiring.
Karl Deisseroth, a Stanford professor of bioengineering and of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, and colleagues believe this paper may be the first to be published with support of the White House BRAIN Initiative, announced last year with the ambitious goal of mapping the brain’s trillions of nerve connections
“This work shares the spirit of the BRAIN Initiative goal of building new technologies to understand the brain – including the human brain,” said Deisseroth, who is also a Stanford Bio-X affiliated faculty member.
The way Deisseroth and his team eliminated the fat was to build a gel within the intact brain that held all the structures and proteins in place. They then used an electric field to pull out the fat layer that had been dissolved in an electrically charged detergent, leaving behind all the brain’s structures embedded in the firm water-based gel, or hydrogel. This is called electrophoretic CLARITY.
The electric field aspect was a challenge for some labs. “About half the people who tried it got it working right away,” Deisseroth said, “but others had problems with the voltage damaging tissue.” Deisseroth said that this kind of challenge is normal when introducing new technologies.
To help expand the use of CLARITY, the team devised an alternate way of pulling out the fat from the hydrogel-embedded brain – a technique they call passive CLARITY. It takes a little longer, but still removes all the fat, is much easier, and does not pose a risk to the tissue. “Electrophoretic CLARITY is important for cases where speed is critical, and for some tissues,” Deisseroth said.. “But passive CLARITY is a crucial advance for the community, especially for neuroscience.”
Many groups have begun to apply CLARITY to probe brains donated from people who had diseases like epilepsy or autism, which might have left clues in the brain to help scientists understand and eventually treat the disease. Yet scientists, including Deisseroth, had been wary of trying electrophoretic CLARTY on these valuable clinical samples with even a very low risk of damage. “It’s a rare and precious donated sample, you don’t want to have a chance of damage or error,” Deisseroth said. “Now the risk issue is addressed, and on top of that you can get the data very rapidly.”
The second advance makes imaging the entire brain easier. In studying any cells, scientists often make use of probes that glow green, blue, yellow or other colors in response to particular wavelengths of light. Using CLARITY, these colorful structures become visible throughout the entire brain, since no fat remains to block the light. However, when the probes are exposed to too much light, they stop working or get bleached. The 2014 update of CLARITY addresses this issue.
“We can now scan an entire plane at one time instead of a point,” Deisseroth said. “That buys you a couple orders of magnitude of time, and also efficiently delivers light only to where the imaging is happening.” The technique is called light sheet microscopy and has been around for a while, but previously didn’t have high enough resolution to see the fine details of cellular structures. “We advanced traditional light sheet microscopy for CLARITY, and can now see fine wiring structures deep within an intact adult brain,” Deisseroth said. His lab built their own microscope, but the procedures are described in the paper, and the key components are commercially available. Additionally, Deisseroth’s lab provides free training courses in CLARITY to help disseminate the techniques.
The BRAIN Initiative is being funded through several government agencies including the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which funded Deisseroth’s work through its new Neuro-FAST program. Deisseroth said that like the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, another major funder of the new paper), DARPA “is interested in deepening our understanding of brain circuits in intact and injured brains to inform the development of better therapies.” The new methods Deisseroth and his team developed will accelerate both human- and animal-model CLARITY. As CLARITY becomes more widely used, it will continue to help reveal how those inner circuits are structured in normal and diseased brains, and perhaps point to possible therapies.
Other arms of the BRAIN Initiative are funded through the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A working group for the NIH arm was co-led by William Newsome, professor of neurobiology and director of the Stanford Neurosciences Institute, and also included Deisseroth and Mark Schnitzer, associate professor of biology and of applied physics. That group recently recommended a $4.5 billion investment in the BRAIN Initiative over the next 12 years, which NIH Director Francis Collins approved earlier this month.
In addition to funding by DARPA and NIMH, the work was funded by the NSF, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Simons Foundation and the Wiegers Family Fund.